Who's behind yaocho and why
At the end of the whacky senshuraku that concluded with the playoff between
Hakuho and Kakuryu, my mind was really racing because I didn't think that any of
the key bouts during the day were fought straight up. As I was going over
different scenarios in my head regarding the "why" (I can usually see the
"what"...I just can't always explain the "why"), I was awaken from my trance by
the image of Kitanoumi Rijicho handing the Emperor's Cup to Yokozuna Hakuho.
Good ole Kitanoumi. I mentioned this in my pre-basho report, but the recent
elections held at the end of January to seat the new members on the Sumo
Association's board received little to no coverage from the media. In fact, I
only saw one news outlet that even carried it, and that's where I actually
learned that Kitanoumi along with Kokonoe and even Oguruma were reinstated to
their former positions as directors with Kitanoumi being elected as the chief
director, or commissioner as I like to call him.
Kitanoumi resigned after a long string of scandals that included a case of
negligent homicide and drug usage among other improprieties, and when one of his
own rikishi tested positive for reefer, the Ministry of Education had to do
something since sumo is supplemented by tax-payer yen. Eventually, Kitanoumi and
Kokonoe resigned from the board under pressure in order to take partial
responsibility for the scandals, so the fact that they were quietly reinstated
is a complete joke that only obedient sheep wouldn't notice.
Oguruma-oyakata is an interesting story as well. One of his guys, Wakakirin, was
actually busted by police in the back of a seedy Tokyo CD shop with marijuana on
his person, and so in order to take responsibility for the crime,
Oguruma-oyakata was also released from his duties as on official in the
organization and demoted a couple of levels...for a couple of years. Oguruma is
actually my favorite elder next to Miyagino, so I'm happy to see him reinstated
as a director on the board, but this quiet re-establishment of the old guard
shows you that sumo is unrepentant and only went through the actions they did to
appease the Ministry of Education for a season.
Well, I was reading about the new Juryo newcomers, and one of them (along with a
returnee) will fight for the Kise-beya, which was suddenly re-established on
April 1st. If you remember a couple of years ago, Kise-oyakata was guilty of
providing prime seating around the dohyo to members of Japan's organized crime
groups (yakuza), and once that story broke, Kise was stripped of his shisho
status, demoted, and his rather successful stable was absorbed by the
Kitanoumi-beya. One would think the re-establishment of the Kise-beya would
garner some press, but the only way it was reported was as an insignificant line
item at the end of an article that talked about the new Juryo guys. Hell, I read
multiple articles devoted solely to the Oshima-beya merging with the
Tomozuna-beya, but there was no direct mention of the Kise-beya coming back, a
far more newsworthy occurrence.
There's a couple of points I want to make about all of this. First, it's not
coincidence that all this has largely gone unreported. It's proof that the media
is in bed with the Sumo Association, but you would have already known that if
you had been reading Sumotalk the last half decade since we've always pointed
out mutual, orchestrated cooperation between the two entities.
Second, if you think the sumo atop the dohyo is squeaky clean and that the sport
in general is clean, how do you explain the casual reinstatement of these
serious sinners? I have a difficult time believing that a product on display is
completely clean when the people running it have shown they aren't. Homicide,
gambling, association with organized crime, drug usage, and bout fixing are all
serious sins, but the people in charge when all of this occurred are sitting
once again around that table forming sumo's board of directors.
Well, only one guy has yet to be reinstated as far as I've read:
Takasago-oyakata. Any idea why he would not be restored to his former glory? I
don't know the answer for certain, but I suspect it has something to do with his
being the stable master of Asashoryu. Asashoryu was constantly maligned by the
media and even by members of the Sumo Association, and receiving nearly as much
criticism was Takasago-oyakata for failing to keep his prodigy in check. I
always defended Asashoryu because 1) he was vital to sumo's success and
popularity, and 2) he was the second coming of Chiyonofuji so criticizing
Asashoryu for things that Chiyonofuji was guilty of was an obvious double
standard. I've already blogged at length on that second item, so I won't rehash
it here, but Asashoryu was clearly a victim of racial prejudice.
While all of that was going on, there was always one thing that I couldn't
really put a finger on, however. Why was Asashoryu getting dragged through the
mud when Hakuho was treated extremely fair? Both were Mongolians, and both had
the potential to surpass 32 career yusho, so why the unbalanced treatment? I
reasoned that the difference in treatment was that Asashoryu came first, he had
the abrasive personality, and he was guilty of multiple missteps away from the
dohyo. Still, the obvious bias against Asashoryu and the treating of Hakuho as a
choir boy couldn't be explained away so casually. I knew there had to be
something else then, but I wasn't quite sure at the time.
Now, however, I think I understand what has happened. During the New Year's
holiday at the end of 2010, the former Miyagino-oyakata was stripped of his
shisho status, he was demoted, and the reins of his stable were rightly turned
over to the man who had built the stable up in the first place, recruited
Hakuho, and raised him into a Yokozuna. That person was the former Kumagatani-oyakata
and now current Miyagino-oyakata. Like the newsworthy stories I mentioned in the
beginning, this transfer of power received very little coverage, and the Sumo
Association purposefully made the change during the country's busiest holiday
when the fewest number of people were paying attention to anything besides
alcohol and unfunny television. This change in leadership wasn't scandalous at
all, but making such a change in the Yokozuna's stable would normally warrant a
bit of coverage. The problem was...how do they have this switch in leadership
covered by the media and not have anybody note on the side that, "the former
Miyagino-oyakata was demoted for allowing himself to be recorded by a mistress
proclaiming he paid Asashoryu for throwing a bout in Hakuho's favor." Getting
busted for yaocho itself was one thing, but yaocho between a Yokozuna and an
Ozeki (Hakuho's rank at the time) was the last thing the Sumo Association wanted
rehashed a month before the yaocho scandal would break, an occurrence they knew
would happen when it did. This newsworthy story was kept very quiet, worded with
as much brevity as possible, and timed to fit sumo's agenda so the focus of the
yaocho scandal could be centered on Maegashira scrubs and Juryo rikishi, not the
high-ranking members of the sport.
I stated this previously in a report, but I believe Miyagino-oyakata was
reinstated when he was because he needed to guide Hakuho through a time when
sumo was desperately trying to restore its popularity. Prior to that
reinstatement, Hakuho had just concluded a 63 bout winning streak, and he was
making a total mockery out of the zensho yusho record. From the last half of
2008 through the end of 2010, Hakuho lost a total of 11 times in those two and a
half years meaning his average win total per basho was 14.3 wins. Since that
reinstatement, however, Hakuho has lost 14 times in the course of 7 basho, and
his longest winning streak since sumo resumed after the yaocho scandal is just
16.
Another interesting stat is this. During that 2 1/2 year stretch prior to the
switch in oyakata, 45% of Hakuho's losses occurred in week 1. Since the change
was made? Zero. Furthermore, the number of rikishi Hakuho has lost to after the
switch that currently do not hold the rank of Ozeki? Zero. It is my belief that
the majority of Hakuho's losses are strategic as we've been pointing out in the
daily comments the past year. In my opinion, Hakuho has been beaten legitimately
twice in the last seven basho, both times by Baruto in Kyushu and Nagoya last
year. Okay, maybe that henka at the hands of Harumafuji was unplanned, but
still, the number of legitimate losses is right in line with Hakuho's
performance prior to the switch in oyakata.
Hakuho did not suddenly trend down in his sumo. He went from 14.3 wins per
tourney down to 13.0 wins per tourney in the blink of an eye, and lest you think
that 1.3 wins per tourney is not a significant drop, look at it this way: Hakuho
lost four times in the seven tournaments preceding the change; he lost 14 times
the 7 tournaments after the change. Hakuho did not peak several years ago, and
he is not in the declining years of his career. He's fighting in his prime and
has shown no visual signs of slowing down; his dominance the first week of the
basho suggests this, and the fact that he never loses to rikishi outside the top
7 and never gives up kin-boshi further manifests this. So, all of this data
suggests to me that Hakuho is dropping bouts on purpose, but that's not even the
point I'm trying to make. The point is this: we've seen a noticeable change in
Hakuho's numbers since Hakuho's true mentor resumed the title of shisho at the
very end of 2010.
It's a subject that Clancy and I have been discussing offline for some time now,
but we believe it's the oyakata who are making the calls regarding what happens
in the ring late each day, not the rikishi themselves nor their tsuke-bito. In
essence, you have two types of bout fixing going on: bout fixing that occurs
among lesser rikishi as a means to keep a hefty paycheck coming in (this was the
type exposed in the huge yaocho scandal) and bout fixing that occurs among the
elite rikishi to keep things balanced and the general public interested.
Regarding the latter, I believe it's being organized at the oyakata level. And
this is not to say that every bout every day is rigged because that is
absolutely not the case. What I am suggesting, however, is that the board of
directors and other sumo elite convene regularly to discuss what's best for the
sport in terms of remaining a viable entity able to sustain itself with as
little outside help as possible. Sumo is being subsidized by the Japanese
government, and while we're talking of news that is barely reported in the
press, the announcement in February regarding sumo's financial standing the
previous fiscal year revealed numbers that were disastrous and showed that sumo
is hemorrhaging money.
Sumo is in trouble and they know it, and the only way to start raising it's
popularity and appeal is to have Japanese rikishi perform well on the dohyo.
Back in the early nineties after Chiyonofuji, Hokutoumi, and Asahifuji's
retirement, there was actually a time when there were no Ozeki nor Yokozuna on
the banzuke. Akebono was the first to breakthrough and seize the Yokozuna rank,
and then you had Konishiki and Musashimaru (two more Americans) who were
threatening a virtual stranglehold on the sport. But putting a stop to that were
two brothers, Takanohana and Wakanohana, who were the sons of a popular Ozeki in
the 70's. The two brothers took the sport by storm and singlehandedly
transformed sumo from a traditional sport enjoyed by older people into a
national frenzy craved by everyone. It wasn't so much that the Hanada brothers
were the sons of a popular Ozeki; rather, they were Japanese and they were
taking the sport back from the threatening foreigners. They were literal
saviors, and the Sumo Association reaped the benefits for a decade.
Nearly 20 years after Takahanada first beat Chiyonofuji at the 1992 Natsu basho
signaling a change in the guard, sumo has experienced the high of all highs but
now finds itself in the lowest of lows, and the only way they can reverse this
trend is to place elite Japanese rikishi back on the dohyo who aren't only
exciting but who can win. And by win, I mean overtake the pesky foreigners on
the banzuke once and for all. With such a dominant Yokozuna in place, such a
scenario is impossible without strict cooperation from the Yokozuna himself. I
don't think anyone really questions that Kotoshogiku and Kisenosato's Ozeki runs
were achieved without some assistance from Hakuho, and Hakuho showed us in Osaka
that he can take the yusho any time he damn well pleases. But having a
foreign-born Yokozuna make these decisions by himself is not an acceptable
scenario for a Japanese institution. A foreigner just can't be trusted, and so
it was imperative that Miyagino-oyakata be put back in place as Hakuho's stable
master so Miyagino could sit in council with the sumo elders and then recommend
to his prodigy the best course of action to take that would benefit the
Association as a whole.
Which brings me to a point I talked about early on in this report...why was
Takasago-oyakata never reinstated to his former position as a director on the
board? My theory is that Takasago received the same instruction that Miyagino is
receiving now, but he failed to get his prodigy (Asashoryu) to cooperate in full
with the agenda established by the Association. As a result, Asashoryu was
reviled to no end by members of the media and by sumo officials who wanted him
out for the good of sumo...not because he was hurting the sport's popularity or
ratings (look what's happened since he left), but because he was an obstacle in
allowing Japanese rikishi to yusho and to achieve the Yokozuna rank. And not
only was Asashoryu's character assassinated relentlessly in the media, but
Takasago-oyakata was blamed as well for not keeping his guy in line. Why else
would Takasago not be reinstated to the board the same as his other peers?
I do believe that Asashoryu purposefully threw bouts to assist the three
Japanese Ozeki at the time (Tochiazuma, Chiyotaikai, and especially Kaio) in
order to help them maintain their ranks--standard protocol for any Ozeki and
Yokozuna, but my opinion is that he refused to take it a step further and
cooperate fully with the Sumo Association's agenda and make himself appear
weaker and vulnerable than he really was in order to let a Japanese rikishi
reach the rank of Yokozuna or yusho with any regularity. I don't think he had a
problem if any of the Japanese rikishi took the yusho or achieved the sport's
top rank, but he wanted them to earn it just as he did. I believe that like
Chiyonofuji, he had that mindset that he was going to kick your ass no questions
asked, and ultimately, this mindset coupled with pride in his abilities and his
race led to his eventual downfall. I could be wrong in all of this, but then why
take it out on Takasago as well?
It's questions such as these that make sumo such a fascinating sport to me, and
I suppose it's the reason why I comment on sumo the way that I do. I cannot
watch Kakuryu display brilliant sumo for 14 straight days and then watch him
exhibit such a senseless tachi-ai on senshuraku against a very predictable
Goeido with the yusho on the line and not question why that happened. It is my
opinion that the majority of foreign fans treat sumo as a completely objective
sport and never question the outcome of bouts and tournaments. It's a completely
acceptable stance to take, and it rewards you at face value since you have
exciting bouts, upsets, promotions, disappointments, and yusho races that
sometimes come down to an exciting playoff. But I believe that Sumotalk works
because it makes English-speaking fans at least think about issues that they
would normally not have considered.
For the first time ever in March, Sumotalk topped 14,000 unique readers for the
first time. It's a number that we were flirting with back when Asashoryu was
still around, but after his retirement and the string of continuous scandals
ending with the cancellation of last year's Haru basho, our monthly unique
readership dropped down to the 10.5k - 11K range per month as more and more fans
became disenchanted with sumo. That this number began to steadily climb starting
last May culminating in our best month ever for the 2012 Osaka basho tells me
that more and more sumo fans are questioning some of the things occurring in the
dohyo, and even if they don't want to believe it in their hearts, they at least
want confirmation in their minds that they might have seen something.